Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[c]onclusory allegations or denials” without supporting facts are “insufficient to raise a triable issue of material fact”
• holding that CPLA claim did not accrue simply by presence of asbestos but upon discov- ery of actual harm caused by the dangerous product
• holding that to successfully oppose summary judgment, “[i]t is not sufficient merely to assert a conclusion without supplying supporting arguments or facts”
• explaining that in opposing summary judgment “[i]t is not sufficient merely to assert a conclusion without supplying supporting arguments or facts”
• rejecting plaintiffs claim that it should not be charged with discovery of injury until plaintiff “knew with certainty” that injury existed, and to what extent plaintiff was injured
• determining when product liability actions accrue for statute of limitations purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).