Guimei v. General Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where defendants were not California-based corporations, the state “has little interest in keeping the litigation in this state to deter future wrongful conduct”
• finding that where defendants were not California-based corporations, the state “has little interest in keeping the litigation in this state to deter future wrongful conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-06-01· cited 140×
• Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-05-28· cited 65×
• Hahn v. Diaz-Barba
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-04-29· cited 42×
• Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. Schmidt
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-05-31· cited 42×
• National Football League v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-05-28· cited 24×
• O'Donoghue v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-08-29· cited 20×
• Poniktera v. Seiler
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-01-21· cited 19×
• David v. Medtronic, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-06-12· cited 7×
• Cariajano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 6×
• Aghaian v. Minassian
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-02-17· cited 6×
• Auffret v. Capitales Tours, S.A.
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-08-21· cited 1×
• Cariajano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-06-01
• O'Donoghue v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-09-27
• Cal. Bank & Trust v. Del Ponti
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-12-09
• Verdugo v. Alliantgroup
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-06-25
• David v. Medtronic, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-06-26
• Wang v. Fang
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-01-11
• St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-06-20
• Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-06-24
• EpicentRx v. Super. Ct.
  California Supreme Court· 2025-07-21

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 4,581×
• Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 1,961×
• Ballard v. Uribe
  California Supreme Court· 1986-04-03· cited 606×
• Bowers v. Bernards
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-01-12· cited 386×
• Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 272×
• Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1991-11-21· cited 137×
• In Re Tobacco Cases II
  California Supreme Court· 2007-08-02· cited 133×
• Department of Parks & Recreation v. State Personnel Board
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-08-26· cited 79×
• Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of Azerbaijan
  S.D. New York· 2004-12-28· cited 78×
• In Re Cheryl E.
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-02· cited 73×
• DiPirro v. BONDO CORPORATION
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-07-12· cited 67×
• Watson v. Department of Rehabilitation
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-08-08· cited 61×
• Eastman Kodak Co. v. Kavlin
  S.D. Florida· 1997-09-09· cited 51×
• Phoenix Canada Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1978-04-10· cited 51×
• Rasoulzadeh v. Associated Press
  S.D. New York· 1983-10-31· cited 50×
• Concerned Citizens of Vicksburg v. Sills
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-02-13· cited 48×
• Robbins v. Los Angeles Unified School District
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-01-21· cited 47×
• Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. v. Gaddy
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-02-07· cited 47×
• Canadian Overseas Ores Ltd. v. Compania De Acero Del Pacifico S.A.
  S.D. New York· 1982-01-07· cited 43×
• Morris v. AGFA CORP.
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-11-21· cited 36×