Skip to main content
· 12/28/2004

Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of Azerbaijan

Citations

  • 349 F. Supp. 2d 736
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25915
  • 2004 WL 2997881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the first prong of the commercial-activity exception applies where a sovereign expropriated plaintiffs’ assets outside the United States and attempted to resell them to third-party investors in the United States
  • holding that a foreign bank’s performance of wire transfers are not “minimum contacts”
  • explaining that transaction of business under New York’s long-arm statute may be imputed to co- conspirators
  • explaining that transaction of business under New York’s long-arm statute may be imputed to co- conspirators
  • finding no personal jurisdiction under conspiracy theory because there was no factual basis from which court could impute conduct of putative co- conspirators to defendants
  • authorizing jurisdictional discovery “regarding the extent of defendant [bank's] general business contacts with the United States [during the relevant period]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.