Rasoulzadeh v. Associated Press

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Iran to be an inadequate forum in part because “if the plaintiffs returned to Iran to prosecute this claim, they would probably be shot”
• limiting Rasoulzadeh to cases in which danger implicates the plaintiffs access to the alternate justice system
• denying a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens where plaintiffs would likely be shot if they pursued their claim in Iran
• plaintiff would be executed were he to attempt to litigate in postrevolutionary Iran

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).