In re Tobacco Cases II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing in detail the complexity of estimating damages in cases where the 9 harm arises from deceptive advertising
• “A full refund may be available when the plaintiffs prove the product had no value to them.”
• “A full refund may be available in a UCL case when the plaintiffs prove the product had no value to them.”
• “A full refund may be available in a UCL case when the plaintiffs prove the product had no value to them . . . since the price paid minus the value actually received equals the price paid.”
• “Under plaintiffs’ theory, a full refund would be available on any product, even costly items such as cars, yachts, and planes, based on UCL violations that had little or no impact on value. That, of course, is not the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).