· 12/30/1982
Guenard v. Burke
Citations
- 443 N.E.2d 892
- 387 Mass. 802
- 1982 Mass. LEXIS 1821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting a fee based on the fair value of services despite a specific violation of a court rule forbidding the divorce contingency
- holding question of fair and reasonable compensation one for jury
- refusing to enforce contingent fee contract in divorce proceeding when such an agreement violated the prohibition against contingent fee contracts in such cases
- an attorney's reliance on a fee agreement that violated ethical rules “was, as a matter of law, an unfair or deceptive act or practice”
- reasonable compensation owed to attorney with unenforceable contingent fee agreement is question of fact
- deposition and contrary affidavit both considered in passing on motion for summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.