Skip to main content
· 12/30/1982

Guenard v. Burke

Citations

  • 443 N.E.2d 892
  • 387 Mass. 802
  • 1982 Mass. LEXIS 1821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting a fee based on the fair value of services despite a specific violation of a court rule forbidding the divorce contingency
  • holding question of fair and reasonable compensation one for jury
  • refusing to enforce contingent fee contract in divorce proceeding when such an agreement violated the prohibition against contingent fee contracts in such cases
  • an attorney's reliance on a fee agreement that violated ethical rules “was, as a matter of law, an unfair or deceptive act or practice”
  • reasonable compensation owed to attorney with unenforceable contingent fee agreement is question of fact
  • deposition and contrary affidavit both considered in passing on motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.