Incase Incorporated v. Timex Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a there was no evidence in the record to support a conclusion that the party bringing the trade secrets claim “took reasonable steps to preserve the secrecy” of its purported trade secrets
• explaining that “[s]imple breach of contract is not sufficiently unfair or deceptive to be alone a violation of Chapter 93A” (citation omitted)
• explaining that a “[s]imple breach of contract is not sufficiently unfair or deceptive to be alone a violation of Chapter 93A”
• finding plaintiff did not take reasonable steps because they failed to communicate confidentiality policies to defendant
• “Simple breach of contract is not sufficiently unfair or deceptive to be alone a violation of Chapter 93A.”
• “To prevail on a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets, a plaintiff must show: 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).