Skip to main content
· 10/10/1990

In Re Marriage of Malec

Citations

  • 562 N.E.2d 1010
  • 205 Ill. App. 3d 273
  • 150 Ill. Dec. 207
  • 59 U.S.L.W. 2326
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 1576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because handwritten notes by unknown authors affected only the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility, circuit court’s exclusion of personnel files was improper
  • in order to avoid an irrational fee, there must be a correlation between fee and the results obtained in a case
  • attorney may not recover on a contingency fee agreement because the interest of preserving a marriage outweighs possible unjust enrichment concerns
  • attorney may not recover on a contingency fee agreement because the interest of preserving a marriage outweighs possible unjust enrichment concerns
  • the most important factor is that the time charged for must be necessary to handle the matter involved
  • “[A]ttorneys are entitled to recover a fee based on what is usually and customarily charged and paid for like services in the court where the services were rendered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.