McGrath v. Mishara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We see no reason to believe that the Legislature intended in c. 93A to authorize cumulative damages ... for the same wrong”
• “mere fact that these statutes contain some overlapping prohibitions and remedies does not establish a legislative intent to preclude their concurrent application”
• multiple damages provisions of G. L. c. 93A, § 11, “reflect ‘the Legislature’s displeasure with the proscribed conduct and its desire to deter such conduct and encourage vindicative lawsuits’ ”
• landlord’s illegal deducting of rent from tenants’ security deposit
• same under G. L. c. 93A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).