Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Goldstone & Sudalter, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, under Massachusetts law, “[violations of the rules governing the legal profession are evidence of legal malpractice”
• concluding non-moving party’s claim that competent witness on summary judgment record was biased did not satisfy the party’s burden to set forth specific facts showing that a genuine issue existed
• concluding non-moving party’s claim that competent witness on summary judgment record was biased did not satisfy the party’s burden to set forth specific facts showing that a genuine issue existed
• concluding non-moving party’s claim that competent witness on summary judgment record was biased did not satisfy the party’s burden to set forth specific facts showing that a genuine issue existed
• concluding non-moving party’s claim that competent witness on summary judgment record was biased did not satisfy the party’s burden to set forth specific facts showing that a genuine issue existed
• attorney’s conduct in billing client constituted deceptive trade practice in action by client against attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).