Skip to main content
· 9/30/2010

Grine v. Chambers (In Re Grine)

Citations

  • 439 B.R. 461
  • 2010 WL 3910144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that debtor who prevailed on action to enforce automatic stay was entitled to attorneys’ fees necessary to bring action and criticizing the holding in Sternberg
  • concluding that if the fees and costs claimed as damages are proximately caused by and reasonably incurred as a result of the violation then they should be allowed and criticizing Sternberg
  • “If litigation -20- is unnecessary to afford a complete remedy to a debtor, then the fees for commencing and prosecuting an action will fail . . . .”
  • courts generally apply the \lodestar\ method when determining the reasonableness of attorney's fees.
  • courts generally apply the “lodestar” method when determining the reasonableness of attorney’s fees.
  • non-debtor’s alleged loss not shown to have resulted from stay violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary Ann Whipple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.