Loranger v. Stierheim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving an across-the- board percentage cut to either the total number of hours claimed or to the lodestar amount
• placing burden on fee applicant to support request with sufficient detail
• “Where fee documentation is voluminous ... an hour-by- hour review is simply impractical and a waste of judicial resources.”
• “Neither the district judge’s [two-year] delay [in ruling], nor his adverse rulings, constitute the sort of ‘pervasive bias’ that necessitates recusal.”
• “Neither the district judge’s delay, nor his adverse rulings, constitute the sort of ‘pervasive bias’ that necessitates recusal.”
• “[I]t is sufficient for the court to provide a concise but clear explanation of its reasons for the reduction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).