Skip to main content
· 6/28/2011

Duby v. United States (In Re Duby)

Citations

  • 451 B.R. 664
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2356
  • 2011 WL 2557648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an adversary proceeding was necessary, even though the stay violation had already ended, because the debtor had suffered unredressed damages
  • holding that “[b]y requiring a debt- or to incur an injury other than attorney’s fees before such fees are recoverable, the USDA effectively strikes the word ‘including’ from the statute”
  • noting that a willful violation of § 362(k) mandates damages without discussing the Bankruptcy Court’s inherent authority to dismiss an action
  • noting that “attorney’s fees are actual damages under 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(l)” and affirming a fee award for a stay violation where plaintiff recovered no other damages
  • explaining that the plain language of § 362(k)(1) expressly states that attorney’s fees are actual damages
  • explaining that the plain language of § 362(k)(1) expressly states that attorney’s fees are actual damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hillman, Feeney, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.