Skip to main content
· 9/7/2000

Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of Treasury

Citations

  • 227 F.3d 343
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22524
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,238
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1400
  • 2000 WL 1260559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reasonable hourly rate in lodestar calculation should be based on market rates in the court’s jurisdiction, rather than foreign counsel’s typical rate
  • noting that the trial court can consider the Johnson factors “either in determining the basic lodestar fee and/or adjustments thereto”
  • noting that the trial judge may “adjust the lodestar to reflect relevant considerations peculiar to the subject litigation” and listing twelve factors the judge might consider (internal quotations omitted)
  • prevailing market rate in Knoxville, Tennessee for attorney experienced in employment discrimination law is $150.00 per hour
  • reversing the district court’s award of attorney fees because of improper calculation methods
  • “[T]he ‘prevailing market rate’ is the rate which lawyers of comparable skill and experience can reasonably expect to command within the venue of the court of record[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Norris, Suhrheinrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.