· 9/7/2000
Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of Treasury
Citations
- 227 F.3d 343
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22524
- 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,238
- 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1400
- 2000 WL 1260559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that reasonable hourly rate in lodestar calculation should be based on market rates in the court’s jurisdiction, rather than foreign counsel’s typical rate
- noting that the trial court can consider the Johnson factors “either in determining the basic lodestar fee and/or adjustments thereto”
- noting that the trial judge may “adjust the lodestar to reflect relevant considerations peculiar to the subject litigation” and listing twelve factors the judge might consider (internal quotations omitted)
- prevailing market rate in Knoxville, Tennessee for attorney experienced in employment discrimination law is $150.00 per hour
- reversing the district court’s award of attorney fees because of improper calculation methods
- “[T]he ‘prevailing market rate’ is the rate which lawyers of comparable skill and experience can reasonably expect to command within the venue of the court of record[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krupansky, Norris, Suhrheinrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.