Skip to main content
· 12/12/2001

In Re: William Kyle Kisseberth and Ekaterina Kisseberth, Debtors. Ronald R. Henderson v. William Kyle Kisseberth and Ekaterina Kisseberth

Citations

  • 273 F.3d 714
  • 47 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 544
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26412
  • 2001 WL 1575669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an attorney’s “failure to disclose his fees justifies the amount of disgorgement regardless of the degree to which his fees were excessive”
  • stating that the court “will find an abuse of discretion only upon a definite and firm conviction that the trial court committed a clear error of judgment”
  • affirming bankruptcy court’s disgorgement order which mandated the return of fees that were paid from funds outside of the bankruptcy estate due to § 329 disclosure violations
  • explaining bankruptcy courts’ inherent authority to deny compensation for bankruptcy attorneys
  • \An attorney in a bankruptcy case has an affirmative duty to disclose fully and completely all fee arrangements and payments.\
  • \Bankruptcy courts have broad and inherent authority to deny any and all compensation an attorney fails to satisfy the requirements of the Code and Rules.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Gilman, Quist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.