Griffith v. Blatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address ’“new and qualitatively different arguments which, if raised below, might well have affected the development of the evidentiary record”
• Learned intermediary doctrine extended to pharmacists
• Learned intermediary doctrine extended to pharmacists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of Gulfport
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2002-09-05· cited 75×
• Peek v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-28· cited 39×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Pfaff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-22· cited 32×
• Griffith v. Blatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 23×
• Walls v. Alpharma USPD, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-03-05· cited 23×
• Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-03-13· cited 21×
• Kohl v. American Home Products Corp.
  W.D. Arkansas· 1999-12-29· cited 16×
• Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-30· cited 7×
• State v. Finlay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 5×
• J.R.L. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-12-19· cited 5×
• Nail v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-05-13· cited 3×
• J.I.P. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-12-07· cited 2×
• Charles Moore v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2000-11-09

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. General Motors Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 448×
• State v. Hitz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
• McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-11-15· cited 179×
• Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-04-27· cited 139×
• Getchell v. Mansfield
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-10-20· cited 87×
• Leesley v. West
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-11· cited 49×
• Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-21· cited 47×
• Bichler v. Willing
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-07-14· cited 42×
• J. Arlie Bryant, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 39×
• Lasley v. Shrake's Country Club Pharmacy, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-05· cited 35×
• Dortch v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 31×
• Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy Consultants
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 30×
• Raynor v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1986-08-08· cited 20×
• Docken v. Ciba-Geigy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-08· cited 19×
• Ramirez v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-01-29· cited 18×
• Batiste v. American Home Products Corp.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1977-04-05· cited 14×
• Oksenholt v. Lederle Laboratories
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-03-30· cited 7×
• Docken v. Ciba-Geigy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-04-18· cited 5×