Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim for indemnity is a claim for recovery for economic loss that results from physical harm to a third person and is barred in both a negligence and fraudulent misrepresentation action under Ore-Ida
• holding that claim for indemnity is a claim for recovery for economic loss that results from physical harm to a third person and is barred in both a negligence and fraudulent misrepresentation action under Ore-Ida
• \Damages properly recoverable in an action for intentional misrepresentation are those which are a direct and necessary result of defendant's acts or omissions.\
• “Damages properly recoverable in an action for intentional misrepresentation are those which are a direct and necessary result of defendant’s acts or omissions.”
• under pre-ORCP law, treating such a motion to strike as though it were a demurrer
• under pre-ORCP law, treating such a motion to strike as though it were a demurrer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).