Lasley v. Shrake's Country Club Pharmacy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[o]n this record, we cannot say as a matter of law that [the pharmacy] did not breach the standard of care for the duty it owed to [the customer]” in light of expert affidavit concerning pharmacist’s standard of care
• holding that pharmacy had a duty of reasonable care, and that whether the pharmacist's failure to warn that prolonged use of two addictive drugs, in combination, could cause addiction or other adverse consequences violates that duty of care is a question of fact for the jury
• imposing a higher standard of care upon pharmacists because \they are professionals in the health care area\
• whether pharmacist’s failure to warn of drug interactions violates duty of care is question of fact for the jury
• applying this standard to pharmacists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).