Kohl v. American Home Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that, under the Medical Malpractice Act, the limitations period began to run only when the nature of the injury was revealed
• “[UJniformity ... will not be compromised by deciding a unique question wholly dependent on the law of the State of Arkansas.”
• “[A] motion to transfer a case to MDL does not automatically stay discovery, postpone rulings on pending motions, or generally suspend further proceedings in the court in which the action was filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).