Skip to main content

Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray

Citations

  • 894 A.2d 563
  • 391 Md. 608
  • 59 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 807
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a statement on package insert that a prescription drug could be taken with food or milk formed the basis for a claim of express warranty
  • explaining that a statement on package insert that a prescription drug could be taken with food or milk formed the basis for a claim of express warranty
  • affirming breach of express warranty verdict against pharmacy and declining to extend learned intermediary doctrine to cases in which pharmacies “disseminat[e] information concerning the properties and efficacy of a prescription drug”
  • noting “an implied warranty ‘is a “curious hybrid” between tort and contract law’ and differs from express warranties based on contract” (quoting Hous. Auth. of Portland v. Ash Nat’l, 584 P.2d 776, 778 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.