Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/13/2006
Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray
Citations
- 894 A.2d 563
- 391 Md. 608
- 59 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 807
- 2006 Md. LEXIS 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a statement on package insert that a prescription drug could be taken with food or milk formed the basis for a claim of express warranty
- explaining that a statement on package insert that a prescription drug could be taken with food or milk formed the basis for a claim of express warranty
- affirming breach of express warranty verdict against pharmacy and declining to extend learned intermediary doctrine to cases in which pharmacies “disseminat[e] information concerning the properties and efficacy of a prescription drug”
- noting “an implied warranty ‘is a “curious hybrid” between tort and contract law’ and differs from express warranties based on contract” (quoting Hous. Auth. of Portland v. Ash Nat’l, 584 P.2d 776, 778 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arthur Drager v. PLIVA USAFourth Circuit· 2014-01-28· cited 220×
- Weinstat v. Dentsply International, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2010-01-07· cited 151×
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 43×
- Collins v. LiCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-10-02· cited 21×
- McNichols v. Johnson & JohnsonS.D. Illinois· 2006-04-19· cited 9×
- Rosa v. American Water Heater Co.S.D. Texas· 2016-04-07· cited 8×
- Shannon v. FuscoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-04-24· cited 7×
- Keralink International, Inc. v. Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals CorporationFourth Circuit· 2023-02-15· cited 4×
- Fusco v. ShannonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-20· cited 2×
- Keralink International, Inc. v. Stradis Healthcare, LLCFourth Circuit· 2023-02-15
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. Crandall Dry Dock Engineers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-02-26· cited 159×
- Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesSecond Circuit· 1969-10-07· cited 152×
- McKee v. American Home Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 150×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-09· cited 144×
- Jones v. AbrianiIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-06-29· cited 90×
- Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.D. Maryland· 2001-09-25· cited 84×
- Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-11· cited 77×
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-09-05· cited 75×
- Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-09· cited 70×
- Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-16· cited 62×
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2001-03-01· cited 61×
- Murphy v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1985-12-30· cited 57×
- McLeod v. WS Merrell Co., Div. of Richardson-MerrellSupreme Court of Florida· 1965-05-05· cited 56×
- In Re Meridia Products Liability LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2004-07-07· cited 56×
- Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-06-03· cited 55×
- Morgan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-08-10· cited 43×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 2002-06-05· cited 42×
- Bichler v. WillingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-07-14· cited 42×
- Fakhouri v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-07· cited 39×
- Ingram v. Hook's Drugs, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-04-16· cited 37×
Other cases named Rite Aid Corp. v. Levy-Gray
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.