Tenth Circuit· 1/20/1993
Griffin v. Strong
Citations
- 983 F.2d 1540
- 1993 WL 8020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where a promise of leniency has been made in exchange for a statement, an inculpatory statement would be the product of inducement, and thus not an act of free will.” (internal quote marks and citation omitted)
- “The central consideration in determining whether a confession has been coerced always involves this question: did the governmental conduct complained of ‘bring about’ a confession ‘not freely self-determined?’ ”
- “Where a promise of leniency has been made in exchange for a statement, an inculpatory statement would be the product of inducement, and thus not an act of free will.” (quotations omitted)
- police impliedly promised \lesser punishment and physical protection\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, McKay, Seymour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Vincent Anthony PerdueTenth Circuit· 1993-11-01· cited 392×
- United States v. HernandezTenth Circuit· 1996-08-30· cited 219×
- Jeffrey McKinley v. City of MansfieldSixth Circuit· 2005-04-11· cited 177×
- Carolyn Clanton v. Jody CooperTenth Circuit· 1997-11-17· cited 143×
- United States v. Phouc H. Nguyen, A/K/A Jimmy NguyenTenth Circuit· 1998-09-03· cited 68×
- Michael D. Veilleux v. Jeffrey Perschau, Detective for the Manchester Police DepartmentFirst Circuit· 1996-11-20· cited 36×
- Griffin v. StrongTenth Circuit· 1993-01-20· cited 14×
- Fox v. Pittsburg State UniversityD. Kansas· 2017-06-26· cited 11×
- Griffin v. StrongD. Utah· 1993-07-14· cited 8×
- United States v. CervineD. Kansas· 2001-09-04· cited 4×
- United States v. Gale F. BurchTenth Circuit· 1997-05-22· cited 3×
- United States v. LeeD. Kansas· 1997-05-28· cited 3×
- United States v. HartyD. Massachusetts· 2007-03-07· cited 3×
- United States v. McCluskeyD. New Mexico· 2012-08-27· cited 3×
- Veilleux v. PerschauFirst Circuit· 1996-08-30
- McKinley v. MansfieldSixth Circuit· 2005-04-11
- United States v. YoungTenth Circuit· 2020-06-16
- United States v. SmithE.D. Kentucky· 1993-03-19
- United States v. BassettD. Kansas· 1993-11-18
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 379×
- United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 281×
- Cooper v. DupnikNinth Circuit· 1992-05-05· cited 142×
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Randolph Short, and Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1991-10-31· cited 124×
- United States v. RogersTenth Circuit· 1990-03-26· cited 85×
- Wayne Kitchens v. Bryan County National BankTenth Circuit· 1987-08-14· cited 75×
- Curators, University of Missouri v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1992-11-02· cited 60×
- Culver v. County of RensselaerSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 46×
- United States v. Tommy Charles Fountain, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1985-10-30· cited 32×
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-05-16· cited 22×
- Griffin v. StrongD. Utah· 1990-05-14· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.