Skip to main content

Griffin v. State

Citations

  • 946 So. 2d 610
  • 2007 WL 28253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant's claim that evidence presented at sentencing hearing was inadmissible was not subject to preservation as a sentencing error pursuant to rule 3.800(b)
  • determining that a sixty-day requirement in another part of the same rule, rule 3.800(b)(2)(B), is a jurisdictional bar
  • \`Sentencing error' for purposes of [rule 3.800(b) ] was never intended to cover any and all issues that arise at sentencing hearings. . . .\
  • requiring defendant to make contemporaneous objection to preserve apparent errors during sentencing and limiting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2
  • applying ex post facto principles to a statute that assessed costs based on a nolo contendere or guilty plea or a finding of guilt that was entered before the statute’s effective date
  • “[Rule 3.800(b) ] was not intended to give a defendant a ‘second bite at the apple’ to contest evidentiary rulings made at sentencing to which the defendant could have objected but chose not to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.