District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/5/2007
Griffin v. State
Citations
- 946 So. 2d 610
- 2007 WL 28253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant's claim that evidence presented at sentencing hearing was inadmissible was not subject to preservation as a sentencing error pursuant to rule 3.800(b)
- determining that a sixty-day requirement in another part of the same rule, rule 3.800(b)(2)(B), is a jurisdictional bar
- \`Sentencing error' for purposes of [rule 3.800(b) ] was never intended to cover any and all issues that arise at sentencing hearings. . . .\
- requiring defendant to make contemporaneous objection to preserve apparent errors during sentencing and limiting Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2
- applying ex post facto principles to a statute that assessed costs based on a nolo contendere or guilty plea or a finding of guilt that was entered before the statute’s effective date
- “[Rule 3.800(b) ] was not intended to give a defendant a ‘second bite at the apple’ to contest evidentiary rulings made at sentencing to which the defendant could have objected but chose not to do so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-05-29· cited 203×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-04-10· cited 18×
- CABRERABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 12×
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-30· cited 10×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-22· cited 4×
- Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-16· cited 4×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-29· cited 4×
- Kramer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-12· cited 3×
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-30· cited 3×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-23· cited 2×
- Jaimes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-29· cited 2×
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-27· cited 2×
- Denegall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-03· cited 1×
- State v. DENEGALLSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10
- Ronald J. Richards v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2020-01-16
- Pipkin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-28
- Stempler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-09
- Irvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-04
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-11-12· cited 84×
- Yisrael v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-16· cited 72×
- Calloway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 29×
- Goad v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-27· cited 27×
- Waller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 18×
- Ridgeway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-10· cited 11×
- Hayden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 8×
- Cutwright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-04· cited 6×
- Pierce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-04· cited 5×
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-13· cited 5×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-06· cited 5×
- Conroy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.