Hayden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in assessing costs for the juvenile assessment center and Teen Court Program because the statute authorizing those assessments was enacted after the date of the juvenile’s offenses
• holding that the trial court erred in assessing costs for the juvenile assessment center and Teen Court Program because the statute authorizing those assessments was enacted after the date of the juvenile's offenses
• holding cost assessment for juvenile assessment center and teen court program could not be imposed where statutes authorizing imposition of such costs were enacted after date of defendant's offenses
• holding cost assessment for juvenile assessment center and teen court program could not be imposed where statutes authorizing imposition of such costs were enacted after date of defendant's offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 21×
• Griffin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-04-10· cited 18×
• Ridgeway v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-10· cited 11×
• Cutwright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-04· cited 6×
• J.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-21· cited 1×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-19
• Whitaker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pierce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-04· cited 5×
• Pierce v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-06· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 2×