Ridgeway v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that imposing the cost required by section 939.185 on a defendant who committed his crime before its effective date did not violate the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 21×
• Griffin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-04-10· cited 18×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-29· cited 4×
• Denegall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-03· cited 1×
• State v. DENEGALL
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10
• Wooden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-31
• Whitaker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-23
• Lindsay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-18
• Stempler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-09
• Irvin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-04

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lynce v. Mathis
  Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
• State v. Yost
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-05-07· cited 60×
• Gwong v. Singletary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-22· cited 44×
• Goad v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-02-27· cited 27×
• Dixon v. City of Jacksonville
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-28· cited 23×
• STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Goad
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-13· cited 11×
• Hayden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 8×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-19· cited 7×