Gonzalez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute in effect at that time (i.e., section 775.083(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2003)), required the court to conduct an inquiry into the defendant's ability to pay the fine before imposing it
• noting that section 775.083(2)(b) requires the court to conduct an inquiry into a defendant's ability to pay the fine before imposing it
• involving sections 775.083(2) and 939.185, Florida Statutes (2004)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-05· cited 21×
• Watts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-15· cited 4×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-29· cited 4×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-06· cited 4×
• Marsh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-17

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Waller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 18×
• Stewart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-14· cited 4×