Mathis v. State
Citations
- 31 Fla. 291
Syllabus
<p>1. The act of 1889, Chapter 8905, entitled an act to provide for the revision and consolidation of the public statutes of this State, did not invest the Commissioners of themselves with power to enact any new statutory law, or to revive any statute or statutes not in force at the time of the revision. The duty of the Commissioners under this act was to revise, simplify, arrange and consolidate the public statutes then in force into one body, or into the form of one act under titles, chapters and subdivisions, with side-notes to indicate the contents of the original text, with references to show from what act each section was compiled, and to the decisions of the court construing the the statutes ; and they were also authorized and directed to report to the Legislature along with the submission of the printed copy of the revision, such contradictions, omissions and imperfections as may appear in the original text of said acts, and the mode in which they shall have reconciled, supplied and amended the same ; and they were further directed to designate such acts or parts of acts as in their judgment ought to be repealed, with the reason for the same, and also recommend the passage of such new acts as may appear necessary or expedient, either in lieu of, or in addition to, any of the acts so revised and consolidated. The entii'e work of the Commissioners was to be submitted to, and be reviewed by the Legislature, and be re-enacted by that body, if it should so determine.</p> <p>2. The statutes in force in this State at the time of the revision derived their binding force from the prior action of the Legislature, independent of the act of 1889, under which the revision was made, but such new matter as was submitted by the Commissioners with the consolidation of the already existing statutes must derive its po-wer as statutory law from the sanction of the Legislature, in the form of a constitutional enactment..</p> <p>8. The provision in the Revis.ed Statutes that an a
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court· 1988-11-09· cited 217×
- Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida· 1950-07-07· cited 101×
- Amos v. GunnSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-04-07· cited 91×
- Foley v. State Ex Rel. GordonSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-01-23· cited 79×
- Amos v. MosleySupreme Court of Florida· 1917-12-20· cited 67×
- Cook v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1903-02-02· cited 41×
- Sawyer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1906-04-30· cited 39×
- Higginbotham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-05-31· cited 26×
- Grice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-05· cited 18×
- Jones v. ChristinaSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-03-02· cited 16×
- Holland v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-01-15· cited 16×
- Heilmann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-02· cited 14×
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 13×
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 9×
- Rubin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-13· cited 8×
- People ex rel. Chandler v. McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court· 1895-10-25· cited 6×
- Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 4×
- Kanter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-08-29· cited 4×
- In re PongHawaii Supreme Court· 1906-07-02· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. George v. SwiftNevada Supreme Court· 1875-07-15· cited 43×
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 40×
- John D. C. v. State ex rel. Julia V. H.Supreme Court of Florida· 1878-01-15· cited 38×
- State ex rel. Boyd v. DealSupreme Court of Florida· 1888-06-15· cited 29×
- People v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 27×
- President of Waterford v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court· 1850-07-01· cited 26×
- Ex parte PellsSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-06-15· cited 25×
- State ex rel. Markens v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-01-15· cited 23×
- People ex rel. Pulford v. Fire Department of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court· 1875-04-20· cited 23×
- Bibb County Loan Ass'n v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1857-01-15· cited 20×
- Dew v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama· 1856-01-15· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.