Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 11/12/2014

Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 771 F.3d 638
  • 23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1366
  • 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 250
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21440
  • 2014 WL 5840039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “generalized allegations asserting violations of the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the FLSA” are insufficient
  • holding that “a plaintiff asserting a violation of the FLSA overtime 27 provisions must allege that she worked more than forty hours in a given workweek without 28 being compensated for the hours worked in excess of forty during that week.”
  • noting that “most (if not all) of the detailed 19 information concerning a plaintiff-employee's compensation and schedule is in the 20 control of the defendants”
  • stating that even under the more rigorous pleading standard, “plaintiffs in these types of cases cannot be expected to allege with mathematical precision[] the amount of overtime compensation owed by the employer” (international quotation marks omitted)
  • requiring plaintiffs to allege a specific workweek where they suffered violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act
  • repeating the term “given 24 workweek” or “given week” five times in the course of its holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kleinfeld, Rawlinson, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.