State Of Alaska v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “whatever dispute there may be … ha[d] not yet occurred” because the United States reserved the right to assert its interest “at some time” in the future
• holding that when “a party does not ask the district court for leave to amend, ‘the request [on appeal] to remand with instructions to permit amendment comes too late.’”
• holding that “whatever dispute there may be … ha[d] not yet occurred” because the United States reserved the right to assert its interest “at some time” in the future
• holding the BLM’s change in position regarding a claim of ownership constitutes a disputed title under the QTA
• finding the threat or possibility of a future claim or dispute of title is not a disputed title under the QTA
• Possible future dispute of title does not satisfy the jurisdictional requirement for a waiver of sovereign immunity.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).