DeSilva v. North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that RICO claim was unripe where injury was premised on “hypothetical inability to recover” from defendant
• holding the alleged RICO violations were “not the proximate cause of the ultimate harm to plaintiffs, which instead originates in defendants’ underlying” FLSA violation allegations
• explaining that “civil RICO claims [are] precluded where . . . the RICO claims are based on the same facts that would allow recovery under [an] alternative scheme” such as the NLRA
• requiring the plaintiff to allege the approximate number of hours worked and overtime wages to survive a motion to dismiss
• noting that a court “may consider the plan documentation submitted by defendants [on a motion to dismiss] because the plaintiffs’ claims are based upon the ERISA plans and the plan documents plainly are integral to plaintiffs’ complaint”
• finding a distinct enterprise was insufficiently pled on allegations virtually identical to those made here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).