Claywell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “generic grounds such as lack of prejudice to the opposing party or lack of disadvantage to the reviewing court ... are not enough”
• \The Indiana Court of Appeals has jurisdiction in all appeals from final judgments.\ (citing Ind. Appellate Rule 5(A))
• “This Court has considered perfecting a timely appeal a jurisdictional matter.”
• “This Court has considered perfecting a timely appeal a jurisdictional matter.”
• party granted extension of time not precluded from addressing jurisdictional failure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).