Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of constitutional avoidance \has no application in the absence of statutory ambiguity\
• holding that the doctrine of constitutional avoidance “has no application in the absence of statutory ambiguity”
• concluding that Congress is “presumed to be aware” of a statute’s interpretation when it amends another part of the same statute without addressing the part at issue
• concluding that Congress is \presumed to be aware\ of a statute's interpretation when it amends another part of the same statute without addressing the part at issue
• observing that “‘any’... has an expansive meaning, that is, one or some indiscriminately of whatever kind” (some internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that \the canon of constitutional avoidance ... `has no application in the absence of statutory ambiguity'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).