Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/17/2006
Simmons v. State
Citations
- 896 A.2d 1023
- 392 Md. 279
- 2006 Md. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial judge’s prevention of an irrelevant line of questioning regarding the intention of a potential witness to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege was correct
- observing that if an issue is raised and argued in appellant's opening brief, it is adequately raised on appeal in the Court of Special Appeals
- “Managing the scope of cross-examination is a matter that falls within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
- “It is the duty of the trial judge to determine whether the witness can properly assert the privilege against self-incrimination and whether the witness’s silence is justified.”
- discussing applicability of exception adopted in Gray
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-13· cited 29×
- Muhammad v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-11-05· cited 29×
- Abrams v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-26· cited 20×
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-04· cited 13×
- State v. WhittWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-04-06· cited 11×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-07· cited 7×
- Furda v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-06· cited 4×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-10· cited 4×
- Dickson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-28· cited 2×
- Jung Chul Park v. Cangen Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-27· cited 2×
- Thurman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-02· cited 2×
- Trembow v. SchonfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-08· cited 1×
- Mines v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-27· cited 1×
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-28
- Westley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-02
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-28
- Corman Marine Const. v. McGeadyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-01
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-11-06
- Joiner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-05-30
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-04-16· cited 898×
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1917-06-04· cited 229×
- Ex parte IrvineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio· 1896-04-07· cited 106×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-05· cited 70×
- Langworthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-28· cited 58×
- Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-21· cited 57×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-10· cited 55×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-11· cited 53×
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-20· cited 49×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-01· cited 45×
- Bhagwat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-16· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.