Skip to main content

Simmons v. State

Citations

  • 896 A.2d 1023
  • 392 Md. 279
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial judge’s prevention of an irrelevant line of questioning regarding the intention of a potential witness to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege was correct
  • observing that if an issue is raised and argued in appellant's opening brief, it is adequately raised on appeal in the Court of Special Appeals
  • “Managing the scope of cross-examination is a matter that falls within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
  • “It is the duty of the trial judge to determine whether the witness can properly assert the privilege against self-incrimination and whether the witness’s silence is justified.”
  • discussing applicability of exception adopted in Gray

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.