Supreme Court· 6/20/1996

Gray v. Netherland

Citations

518 U.S. 152
116 S. Ct. 2074
135 L. Ed. 2d 457
1996 U.S. LEXIS 4050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that general appeal to broad concept such as due process is insufficient presentation of issue to state court
concluding that petitioner does not satisfy the § 2254(b) exhaustion requirement “by presenting the state courts only with the facts necessary to state a claim for relief’
ruling that due process required more than one day’s notice of evidence to be used by the prosecution would be a new rule
holding that procedural default is normally an affirmative defense that will be waived if not raised
holding that unexhausted claim not proeedurally defaulted unless further resort to state law would be futile and state law would proeedurally bar claim
holding that procedural default is normally an affirmative defense that will be waived if not raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rehnquist, O'Con-Nor, Kennedy, Thomas, Stevens, Ginsburg, Souter, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

448 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gray v. Netherland

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.