Coleman v. Tollefson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “prior dismissal on a statutorily enumerated ground counts as a strike even if the dismissal is the subject of an appeal”
• holding that plaintiffs who qualify for IFP status “may commence a civil action without prepaying fees or paying certain expenses”
• holding that courts must count a dismissal as a strike even though the appeal of the strike is pending
• holding that plaintiffs who qualify for IFP status “may commence a civil action without prepaying fees or paying certain expenses”
• holding that plaintiffs who qualify for IFP status “may commence a civil action without prepaying fees or paying certain expenses”
• holding that a “strike” dismissal is counted regardless to the timing of a subsequent appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).