Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 7/23/2019

Eaton v. Pacheco

Citations

  • 931 F.3d 1009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the failure to address an issue in the reply brief constitutes a waiver of “any non-obvious responses” that the appellant could have made
  • declining to 14 consider Brady claim 7 attacking conviction because district court only granted COA on such claim as it related to his sentence
  • declining to address a Brady claim that fell outside the scope of issues designated in the COA
  • treating “any non- obvious responses [the appellant] could have made as waived” when he “doesn’t respond to” an argument on appeal
  • confirming when a litigant fails to “respond to” the opposition’s “argument in his reply brief[,] . . . we treat any non-obvious responses he could have made as waived and assume the [opposition’s] analysis is correct”
  • rejecting argument raised “for the first time” in a Rule 59(e) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Moritz, Eid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Eaton v. Pacheco

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.