State v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the notion that geography alone should confer sentencing benefits upon a defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-05-08· cited 37×
• State v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-02-12· cited 31×
• State v. Pollard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-04-26· cited 13×
• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-02-26· cited 8×
• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-03-20· cited 6×
• State v. Key
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-04-18· cited 1×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Gideon v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
• Custis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,278×
• Scott v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
• Nichols v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 832×
• State v. Rice
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-31· cited 99×
• State v. Orr
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 77×
• State v. Buckland
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1989-07-14· cited 45×
• State v. Delacruz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-07-14· cited 45×
• United States v. Patrick M. Reilley
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-10-28· cited 31×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-10-27· cited 20×
• State v. Aleman
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-04-10· cited 18×
• Graham v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-23· cited 18×
• State v. Hankins
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-09-02· cited 17×
• State v. Chiles
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-05-31· cited 14×
• State v. Chronister
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-10-13· cited 13×
• State v. Likins
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-08-04· cited 11×
• Shayesteh v. City of South Salt Lake
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-07-06· cited 10×