Gonzalez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the reporting requirements as well as the notification requirements of Florida's Sexual Predator Act are regulatory and procedural in nature and do not violate the ex post facto clause
• rejecting appellant's argument that the Florida Sexual Predators Act imposes punishment ex post facto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-08· cited 22×
• Therrien v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-25· cited 20×
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-17· cited 10×
• Cuevas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-31· cited 8×
• Freeland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 5×
• Boyer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-27· cited 4×
• GILBERTO ALVAREZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-08-10

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Collie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-01· cited 70×
• Fletcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-26· cited 37×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 13×
• Rickman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-19· cited 12×
• Arnold v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-04· cited 11×
• Oce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-22· cited 9×
• Deatley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-31· cited 1×