Freeland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the registration and reporting requirements of the Sexual Predator Act are \regulatory and procedural in nature and do not violate the ex post facto clause.\
• registration and reporting requirements of Fla. Stat. s. 943.0435 are regulatory and procedural in nature and do not violate the ex post facto clause.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Therrien v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-25· cited 20×
• Givens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 11×
• Boyer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-27· cited 4×
• Price v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-03· cited 1×
• Leitsch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Westerheide v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 152×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 13×
• Rickman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-19· cited 12×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-06· cited 9×
• Hilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-20· cited 2×