Cuevas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that application of section 775.21 “does not violate the ex post facto clause or impermissibly modify a criminal sentence or punishment.”
• determining that designation as a sexual predator may be ordered after a defendant has served his sentence and been released

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Almond v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-01· cited 3×
• McKenzie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-10· cited 2×
• State of Florida v. Brian K. McKenzie
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2021-09-23
• JAMES EVANS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-01-05
• GILBERTO ALVAREZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-08-10
• JORGE A. RUIZ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-10-19

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holly v. Auld
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 735×
• V.K.E. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 55×
• Tropical Coach Line, Inc. v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1960-06-22· cited 50×
• Reyes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-10· cited 27×
• Therrien v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-27· cited 19×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-06· cited 9×