Rickman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that registration requirement of Florida's Sexual Predator Act is procedural and regulatory in nature and does not constitute punishment in violation of ex post facto clause
• holding registration requirements of Florida Sexual Predators Act were procedural and regulatory in nature, and, therefore, did not constitute “punishment” in violation of ex post facto clause
• Registration requirements of Florida Sexual Predators Act were procedural and regulatory in nature, and, therefore, did not constitute \punishment\ in violation of ex post facto clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-08· cited 22×
• Therrien v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-25· cited 20×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-17· cited 18×
• Mendez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-30· cited 14×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 13×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-02· cited 11×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-06· cited 9×
• Freeland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 5×
• Tyler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-03· cited 3×
• Deatley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-31· cited 1×
• Andrews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-05· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fletcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-26· cited 37×
• Houston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-19· cited 1×