Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/9/1990
Gochey v. Bombardier, Inc.
Citations
- 572 A.2d 921
- 153 Vt. 607
- 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 870
- 1990 Vt. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding provision of express warranty created privity of contract between manufacturer and consumer such that consumer could seek remedy of revocation for breach -of that warranty
- providing an express warranty created privily of contract with the manufacturer, enabling the consumer to revoke the contract as a remedy for the breach of implied warranty when the express warranty remedies were inadequate
- overruling Costa “to the extent it is at odds with our decision today.”
- overruling Costa \to the extent it is at odds with our decision today.\
- listing remedies available to consumer under the MMWA when manufacturer warrants defective goods
- correct judgment may be affirmed even though grounds stated in support of it are erroneous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Barney, Springer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-07-07· cited 102×
- In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-11-17· cited 88×
- Hudson v. Town of East MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-11-29· cited 85×
- Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-01-03· cited 60×
- Neal v. SMC Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-02-20· cited 39×
- Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-03-21· cited 38×
- Nicolyn S. Wilbur v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Tri-Nordic, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-06-11· cited 31×
- Wilkins v. Lamoille County Mental Health Services Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-10-21· cited 29×
- In re D.T.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-10-29· cited 27×
- Madkour v. ZoltakSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-03-02· cited 21×
- Putter v. Montpelier Public School SystemSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-06-06· cited 18×
- Jones v. Fleetwood Motor HomesN.D. Illinois· 2000-11-02· cited 18×
- Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-03-26· cited 17×
- Pierce v. Catalina Yachts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-05-19· cited 17×
- Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.D. Vermont· 1993-06-04· cited 15×
- Turnley v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-06-21· cited 14×
- Wyatt v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-08-01· cited 14×
- Mainline Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Nutrite Corp.D. Vermont· 1996-08-12· cited 13×
- In Re Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-12-24· cited 13×
- Kelly v. LordSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-21· cited 11×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-11-10· cited 139×
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-12-21· cited 95×
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-11· cited 78×
- Gasque v. Mooers Motor Car Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1984-03-09· cited 74×
- Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-25· cited 69×
- Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-07-28· cited 67×
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. NovakMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-08-11· cited 30×
- Circus Studios, Ltd. v. TufoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-11-09· cited 21×
- Edward Voytovich v. Bangor Punta Operations, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1974-04-03· cited 18×
- Volvo of America Corp. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1977-05-27· cited 17×
- Massingale v. Northwest Cortez, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-12-31· cited 15×
- Costa v. Volkswagen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-07-15· cited 14×
- Edelstein v. Toyota Motors DistributorsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-10-23· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.