Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a limited warranty for repair or replacement fell within the Magnuson-Moss Act's definition of \written warranty\ which is covered by section 2310(d)'s provision for suit by a consumer who has suffered from a breach of a written warranty
• explaining that a car dealership is the manufacturer’s representative for the purpose of making repairs to the plaintiff’s vehicle under the warranty
• where the New Jersey and Mississippi courts allowed revocation of acceptance against the remote manufacturer
• in a Magnuson-Moss action, the court implicitly recognized the requirement of privity in New Jersey sales law.
• where the New Jersey and Mississippi courts allowed revocation of acceptance against the remote manufacturer
• dealer's undertaking to fulfill the terms and conditions of the \owner service policy\ issued by the manufacturer was a written warranty that prevented disclaimer of implied warranties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).