Skip to main content
· 11/10/1977

Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.

Citations

  • 262 N.W.2d 349
  • 98 A.L.R. 3d 1170
  • 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 945
  • 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that liberal administration of code remedies allows automobile buyers to revoke acceptance against manufacturers
  • holding that liberal administration of code remedies allows automobile buyers to revoke acceptance against manufacturers
  • explaining that a limited remedy does not fail of its essential purpose “[s]o long as the seller repairs the goods each time a defect arises” and discussing the seller’s “obligation to repair” not being relieved by expense and effort
  • explaining that a limited remedy does not fail of its essential purpose “[s]o long as the seller repairs the goods each time a defect arises” and discussing the seller’s “obligation to repair” not being relieved by expense and effort
  • permitting recovery of incidental damages in relation to a consumer transaction, despite a warranty clause excluding incidental damages, when the exclusive repair-and-replace remedy failed of its essential purpose
  • seller had gone out of business and warrantor who was not seller held liable for revocation of acceptance.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.