Skip to main content
· 3/9/1984

Gasque v. Mooers Motor Car Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 313 S.E.2d 384
  • 227 Va. 154
  • 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 120
  • 1984 Va. LEXIS 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n award of compensatory damages . . . is an indispensable predicate for an award of punitive damages”
  • buyer has burden of proof re. timeliness of notice of revocation
  • since the remedy of revocation cancels the contract, restores title and possession to seller, and the purchase price to the buyer, and returns the parties to the status quo ante, manufacturer, having no part in the sales transaction, has no role to play in action
  • buyer cannot use automobile after revocation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.