Skip to main content
· 10/26/1984

State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Wolfenbarger & McCulley, PA

Citations

  • 690 P.2d 380
  • 236 Kan. 183
  • 21 Educ. L. Rep. 695
  • 1984 Kan. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \`[i]n order for the evidence to be sufficient to warrant recovery of damages there must be some reasonable basis for computation which will enable the jury to arrive at an approximate estimate thereof.'\
  • holding that “ ‘[i]n order for the evidence to be sufficient to warrant recovery of damages there must be some reasonable basis for computation which will enable the jury to arrive at an approximate estimate thereof ”
  • discussing damages in the context of a personal injury tort claim
  • “[T]he basic principle of damages is to make a party whole by putting him or her back in the same position as if the injury had not occurred, not to grant a windfall.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.