Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s failure to set out the mathematical procedure used to arrive at its decision was not reversible error because the appellant failed to object to the findings at the district court level
• findings challenged for failing to set forth mathematical procedure used to arrive at income and expenses for gas wells
• remanding case to district court to determine whether party to oil and gas leases should be equitably estopped from claiming termination of the leases was required
• \[A] litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law in order to give the trial court an opportunity to correct them.\
• “Although the phrase ‘in paying quantities’ may not appear in oil and gas leases, it implicitly is a part of the ha-bendum clause.”
• habendum clause is provision defining secondary term of lease after development takes place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).