Krim M. Ballentine v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] motion to dismiss for want of standing is … properly brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), because standing is a jurisdictional matter”
• holding that “standing is a jurisdictional matter”
• dismissing claim where plaintiff failed to satisfy court of the elements of standing
• “A motion to dismiss for want of standing is also properly brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), because standing is a jurisdictional matter.”
• “Motions to dismiss for lack of standing are “properly brought pursuant to rule 12(b)(1), because standing is a jurisdictional matter.”
• “A motion to dismiss for want of standing is [ ] properly brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), because standing is a jurisdictional matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).