Third Circuit· 8/5/2008

Hubbard v. Taylor

Citations

538 F.3d 229
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16545
2008 WL 2967517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that triple-eelled detainees “were not subjected to genuine privations and hardship over an extended period of time for purposes of their due process claim”
holding that triple celling pretrial detainees for three to seven months did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
holding that triple celling pretrial detainees for three to seven months did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
holding that triple celling pretrial detainees for three to seven months did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
concluding that, based on the totality of circumstances, requiring inmates to sleep on mattresses on the floor for three to seven months was not unconstitutional
holding that triple celling of pretrial detainees and use of floor mattresses did not violate detainee’s due process rights because they “were not subjected to genuine privations and hardship over an extended period of time’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Chagares, Hardiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.