Supreme Court of Iowa· 1/19/1994

Giles v. State

Citations

511 N.W.2d 622
1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 18
1994 WL 14388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the purpose of the single-subject requirement is to provide reasonable notice to lawmakers and the public to prevent fraud and surprise
stating that the purpose of the single-subject requirement is to provide reasonable notice to lawmakers and the public to prevent fraud and surprise
holding a substantive change incorporated into a Code correction bill violated single-subject requirement
explaining the single-subject rule discourages passage of unfair legislation on the coattails of more favorable proposals
explaining the single-subject rule discourages passage of unfair legislation on the coattails of more favorable proposals
“Incorporating such a change in a Code correction bill violates the single subject and title requirement of the Iowa Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Layorato, Neuman, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.