Wemark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing attorney-client privilege in the context of criminal cases, including the general prohibition on the disclosure of client’s confidential communications
• discussing attorney–client privilege in the context of criminal cases, including the general prohibition on the disclosure of client’s confidential communications
• affirming denial of postconviction relief claim where there was no credible evidence or jury misconduct
• finding evidence of motive and cover-up activities supported a finding of premeditation
• noting justification of attorney-client privilege is to encourage “unrestrained communication by clients”
• noting “violation of the privilege may implicate the Sixth Amendment right to counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).